Ensuringsafety is a key aspect in the engineering profession. There aredifferent standards that ensure that individuals working in the fieldadhere to safety measures. It is these principles that engineersfollow in guarding themselves and others from accidents. The purposeof this report is to critique the article “ComingAttractions.”
Thearticle “ComingAttractions”discusses proposed revisions to the NFPA 70E for the 2018 edition.According to the author, NFPA 70E 2018 edition will have differentanticipated changes in the definition of terms. One of thedefinitions that would change is that of a qualified person.According to the proposed change, a qualified person will be anindividual who has shown skills and knowledge associated with thebuilding and functioning of electrical apparatus, as well asfittings, and has obtained safety education to detect the risks andmitigate the connected danger (Burdge, 2016). Besides, the articleprovides a revised definition for arc flash boundary. Furthermore,the article offers a new definition for Special Purpose Ground FaultCircuit Interrupter (SPGFCI), where it indicates that this is adevice that is envisioned for the security of people that operates tode-invigorate a circuit or its part within an established period whena ground current goes beyond the values for devices that belong toCategories C, D, and E. In addition, the proposed edition for thestandard provides a new meaning for working distance, which isdefined as the space amid an arc source, chest and face region of anindividual (Burdge, 2016).
Thearticle argues that informational note for some aspects has beenchanged with the new proposed edition of the NFPA 70E standard. Onearea concerns the informational note for arc flash hazard. Accordingto the author, the probability of occurrence of an arc flash incidenthas an impact of increasing when invigorated electrical conductors orportions of a circuit become exposed or when they are within anapparatus in a protected or bounded condition. Also, according to thearticle, there is an extended informational communication for shockhazard. The author posits that a source of probable damage or injuryto health linked to current throughout the body, which results fromcontact or tactic to invigorated electrical conductors, will beconsidered as shock hazard (Burdge, 2016).
Inaddition, the author discusses various articles that relate to thesafety of electrical engineering professionals. The articles dealwith safety issues that include training requirements, personal andother protective equipment, shock risk assessment, arc flash riskassessment, and the establishment of an electrically safe workcondition (Burdge, 2016).
Thearticle supports the concepts as provided in the textbook. Forinstance, the article presents that two forms of risk assessments arerequired for an electricity safety initiative which include arc flashand shock risk assessments (Goetsch, 2015). This idea is alsopresented in the textbook. Further, the concept of safety toelectrical engineers has been presented in both the textbook and thearticle.
Thearticle provides critical information for the safety of electricalengineers professionals. The article is informative to theseindividuals since it offers what is to be expected in the NFPA 70E2018 edition. This is a significant aspect because it can helpengineers become equipped with the standards that are anticipated inthe future. Therefore, the article can be indicated as resourceful tothe electrical engineers because it can aid them in the maintenanceof safety. Furthermore, it has been presented excellently because itis well-structured.
Burdge,G. (2016). Coming Attractions. IndustrialSafety & hygiene News, 50(8)24-25.
Goetsch,D .L. (2015). The basics of occupational safety (2nd ed.). UpperSaddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.