Literatureis art in which some existing concepts are entirely theoretical. Thepower of such statements can as well be achieved when related toother given theories which help readers to seek their deeper meaning.Some quotes on their own do not completely contribute to drive thepoint of an author home. Comparison of quotes is essential in thisart since the literary meanings of given statements can as well beused to expound on a scientific statement and vice versa. In ourcase, it is important to mention that Darwin and Scott were bothscientists. There is always a chance for relativeness in the piecesof work done by individuals found in the same discipline. Theinteraction and parallelism of information between these two greaterwriters are what we seek to explore and acknowledge their own effortsand give credit to their work.
Referringto the history of York ministries in England, there is associatedshrunken of its existence since its inception. The church which wasonce the greatest in this land and the York city had been broughtdown on very occasions. The attacks on this church were war relatedin many cases due to the existence of conquering and rule reign thatwas in place at this particular time. In some other instances, thechurch is brought down due to theft events where the preciousbelonging are taken away by malicious people. In another incident,which occurred on 9th July of 1984 a fire believed to have beencaused by lightning struck the church later costing around 2.5million pounds on repair. Just as vestigial structures in CharlesDarwin’s evolutionary works, the structures are thought to begreatest structures at one point in the lives on the organism.Changes in time and lifestyle have made these structure to completelybecome less significant as they were in the earlier lives.
Forinstance, the appendix on the human was a critical organ for theearlier species of man such as the Homo habilis. The fact that theylive of these creatures at this time involved intake of foodstuffwith many roughages and hard substances like stone particles theorgan was critical in removing them from the digestive system. TheYork Minster has suffered the same effect of reduced importance as ithad many attacks which have always brought it a step lower and lessgreat just like the appendix has become in the lives of human beingstoday. In the same humans can undergo an appendectomy and do withoutthis organ is the same way the York Church has lost its strength inthe minds and souls of believers. People have moved on to seek moreinterventions from other religions such as Islam and Protestants. Theparallelism in the two articles stands out clear, and this shows howwell Scott and Darwin shared the use of language differently toarrive at the interest of delivering their message home.
Thereexists a set of closeness in the branches of Cathedral andMetropolitical Church of St. Peter. The orientations andarchitectural designs used by the early builders of the church arelike phylogenic trees which show how close they have similarities totheir original church in Rome. The conduction of events within thischurches is a representation of what is thought to be the ability totrace back its outstanding characteristics as being the same ingeneral view. Despite a few of the different practices that may beobserved, it remains clear that the root of all that this churchstands on is shared by the original statute or the Roman CatholicChurch. In this way, the work of Scotts refers to the originalstatement of Darwin that were his earliest before he even set sailaround the world. A suggestion that linguistics are different todaybut just like the phylogenic trees they once had a single origin. Thechanges in the environments have always made the development anderuption of new species. The power of natural selection in existenceis believed to wipe out the less aggressive species just like inlanguage development, they all were of the same origin, and changessuch as migration and interaction with newer people lead to the birthof more modern languages.
Sharingthe concept of the Descent of Man Charles Darwin argues that thechanges that occur in the life of man are very gradual. Similarly, inthe idea of Scott and the York Minster, the adoptions of the newreligion among the dwellers of Yorkshire did not happen rapidly. Justthe same way the evolution of languages in the current diverse manraces are believed to have had several modifications all throughuntil the final current language was settled on. Language has beensaid to be extraordinary and distinct just like genomes do. Genomesdescribe the greater differences experienced in different specieswhich can be thought to be a similarity in the evolution of newlanguages. Darwin has argued about the classification of languagesgenealogically just like the classification of species basing ondifferent structures with comparison and contrast. In the same way,Scott’s data on the York Minster Churches also gives a cleardirection of the same concept as it suggests the differences thatlater arises among the branches of this church in different areas aseither way having a baseline comparison and contrast ground.
“Apunctuated equilibrium” which is said to occur in a language whereit undergoes a very slow change over a longer time and laterundergoes a sudden burst of change. The same can be related to thechange that is experienced in vestigial apparatuses. The structuresstart by being less in use which takes a very long stretch of timeand then permanently changes and becomes neglected in the body of anorganism. The development of the York Church in Europe was verygradual and later became the most popular and strongest religion inthe region. Just like language takes a whole new direction gains somepopularity, many people start practicing it, and later on they turnto it as their primary communication tool.
Culturalchange and biological change share the same fundamental properties ofvariation, selection, and inheritance. In this argument, the strengthof genomes is overlooked as having had a stronger influence on thelanguage development. Similarly, the development of Catholic churcheswas because at this time it was the talk of the day and that manypeople were practicing Christianity at this particular time. Justlike any child would pick up a tongue it hears most often before itdevelops a good language abilities then it end up learning that overa critical period is the same way the York Minster become Europe’smost prominent church. The two events are parallel to the directionthey take having entirely different themes. Natural selection is saidto largely determine language development and the most occasionallanguage becomes the new communication tool for an individual in casethere is changed environments. The original language tends to lose itpopularity like vestigial structures. Similarly, the York Minster inYorkshire and later the whole of Europe overpowered the less popularreligions and worshipping places.
Someindividual claims that language are very dynamic, and it changes tosuit the brain more likely than how the bearing would adapt to suitthe style. The introduction of the new way of culture in the Yorkcity was a new roll of events that people would not easily adopt. TheChurches then put procedures that would not lock out believers buttried to change its rules to ensure that it adopted the generalpopulation which later the rules were brought in to give a newdirection. The variations in the York Minster within the new culturesare similarly tagged to the fact that ability of humans to developlanguage is not genetically encoded but through vocal learning.
Insummary, the article has tried to explain the parallelism between the“Evolution of Species,” “The Decent of Man” as depicted byCharles Darwin and other evolutionary theories to give the inceptionexistence and fall of the York Minster Church in England. This isreasons that show change is inevitable and once it sets in there isalways birth of something new. In the same way, we learn thatlanguage development takes the same trend in its diverse races andethnics of the world concerning the biological changes that occur inspecies of animals.