Client’s surname2

AnimalRights

Animal cruelty has been a problem for a longer time now, and thegovernment together with the activists has tried to end the practice.In this case, various actions in the community amount to the tortureof these animals since they are exposed to inhumane conditions. Attimes, the inhumane activities might injure the animals or even killthem instead. In particular, the scenario shows how people areviolating the animal rights, and the need to reconsider how thecurrent laws and revising them to ensure that these animals aredefended. Some of these activities include the animal experiments,trophy hunting, manual labor, selective breeding, as well as thezoos. This essay will evaluate the credibility of these practices,how they harm the animals and violate their rights and if they shouldbe stopped in order to protect the animals.

Should peopleundertake scientific tests using animals?

Scientists have been known to use the animals in testing thecredibility of the drugs that they have devised. For instance, someof the tests have been crucial in providing the cures and vaccinesthat have healed chronic infections that were a problem previously.In this case, the scientists tend to pick the animals since some ofthem such as the primates tend to have the DNA that matches whathuman beings have. Hence, it is more likely that the tests will havethe same outcome if they are applied to both human and the animals.Apart from that, the body physiology is also similar, and thefunctioning of the liver, kidney, and intestines tend to be the same.As a result, the scientists have used the same approach in testingthe efficiency of their cures in healing certain infections. Moreimportant, the technique has been successful since it has discoveredthe vaccines for Hepatitis B as well as polio (Pound &amp Bracken,33). The experiments have also given them a chance to understand howdiseases such as malaria, cancer and HIV/AIDS work. All in all, it isclear that the scientists have used the animals in devising some ofthe necessary drugs and vaccines that have been influential. In theprocess, the researchers have saved the lives of millions of peoplethat could have died because of the diseases. Besides that, the sameprocesses have assisted in devising medicines that are used inhealing the infections that the animals might have (Pound &ampBracken, 36). Evidently, the entire scenario does not benefit thehumans only, but, the animals too. However, most of the activists andthe religious people disagree with certain practices associated withthe animal testing.

Some of the experiments that have used the animals have beenassociated with the mistreatment as well. In particular, the testshave been known to adopt physical restraint, and the animals do notenjoy the freedom that they might require. Apart from that, the samescientists also use involuntary feeding since the animals can bereluctant in undertaking certain duties. Death, decapitations, andburns are just other common phenomena during such sessions. In fact,the legal bodies are supposed to approve the research involved withanimals have failed to monitor such activities and ensure that theyare ethical. The circumstances show that the animals are treatedcruelly, and it indicates that the scientists want to change how theywork. Recent research has proved that the DNA and the body physiologyof the animals and human beings do not match. In this case, thescenario explains why some cures and vaccines had failed in the pasteven after they have been successful while they were being tested onthe animals. For instance, the sleeping pill thalidomide introducedin the 1950s had failed, and nearly 10,000 were affected by itscomplications. The Vioxx that was tested on the mice and it wascaused cardiac deaths as well as the heart attacks that underminedthe health of the 27,000 people (Pound &amp Bracken, 52). Moreimportant, the In vitro (in glass) testing is a viablealternative that can be useful for the testing that will cure theinfections that people might have (Pound &amp Bracken, 53).Furthermore, the approach uses cultured human cells that prioritizethe efficiency of the experiments. It also avoids the animal crueltyand still undertakes the tests that will determine how the diseasesare handled in finding the perfect cure or vaccine that will save thehuman existence.

Should theanimals be used for hard labor?

In some cases, theanimals have often been used for hard labor where they undertake someof the manual jobs. Horses are used to pull huge carriages for longerdistances, and that has been a problem. Some of these people mightbelieve that they are not mistreating the animals since they have theability to engage in such chores. In reality, the activitiestranslate to the animal cruelty since the heavy carriages might makethem tiresome (Favre, 89). Farmers have also used oxen in digging theland in preparation for the planting sessions. They are used to pullcarts and plows, and they might even work a day long. Unfortunately,the farmers might be expected to dig some vast tracts of land wherethey will work without getting enough time to rest. The animals mighteven find insufficient food with fewer nutrients that will help themrecover the energy that they have wasted (Favre, 93). The lack ofrest might also be a hard situation since they will be forced to workeven when it rains, or the sun is intense. Besides that, the donkeysand the mules are other animals that are exposed to the hard laborwhere they have to carry huge loads of materials. They have to pullcarts that for longer distances without resting. Most people evenfail to acknowledge the rights of these animals and create properways to look after them. In this case, the animals need enough restand walk for shorter distance while carrying lighter loads as well.Instead, the current practice shows how most people do notacknowledge the rights and the well-being of the animals, and that isclearly wrong.

It is evident that the animals play a huge role in carrying loads andpreparing the land. However, the farmers need to consider thetechnology advancement that has introduced better agriculturalpractices. For instance, the tractors are used in digging huge tractsof land within a short time. The machinery might work for a longerperiod and finish multiple tasks at a time while the animals are muchslower. More important, the same technological equipment is moreaccurate and efficient since they will prepare the land in the mostappropriate way as well. The progress shows that the farmers nolonger have to use the animals in the agricultural activities sincethey also have rights. Treating them with the required respect willbe important, and it will ensure that they have enough strength. Someareas have not seen the technological changes that have allowed themto have proper machinery to undertake certain duties. Apart fromthat, certain rugged terrains do not permit the movement of vehiclesand only allow mules and donkeys. In such cases, the owners need tounderstand that the animals should not walk for longer distanceswithout resting (Favre, 92). Besides that, the owners should ensurethat the animals carry lighter loads that will not be a huge burdento the animals. The animals should also have enough food and avoidscenarios where the harsh weather conditions can undermine how theywork. On the other hand, the animals should be treated with therespect they deserve, and they should not be whipped occasionallywhile they are working. Clearly, they deserve enough respect thatwill make sure they live a comfortable life where they are free fromthe cruelty that is often undertaken against them instead.

Is selectivebreeding in animals wrong?

Selective breeding has been more common among the Scientists thatfocus on improving the species of various animals with the aim ofincreasing the productivity. For instance, they have undertaken theprocess using different species of the dairy cattle in order to havea final species. Furthermore, they will undertake certain measures toincrease the milk yield and that will mean combining species that arehighly productive (Dawkins &amp Layton, 147). In this case, the cowand the bull will have a calf that will give more milk as well.Often, the scientists tend to undertake such processes to benefit thehumans by increasing the yields. Instead, the approach might also beused to eliminate a certain disease that has been common among aparticular species. Hence, the approach tends to play different rolesin the society. However, the animal activists have often criticizedthe scientists since they have focused on the experiments that willonly benefit the human being. They have improved the animals toensure that it produces more food, yet, they are less concerned withthe consequences of their activities. As a result, there is the needto focus on the selective breeding that will improve the chances ofthe animals surviving for longer periods (Dawkins &amp Layton, 147).The tests should also insist on the ways of overcoming the diseasesthat might be a problem to a particular species. Hence, the researchshould often focus on improving their chances of overcoming thediseases. Besides that, they should also increase the naturalimmunity of these animals and make sure that nothing will be aproblem as well. The current trend is a shame to the scientific fieldsince the manufacturers simply want more raw materials that will beused to produce their final products as well.

Despite the benefits of the selective breeding, the process hasmultiple consequences that prove how ineffective they are. Inparticular, the tests have often led to animal discomfort when thescientists fail in achieving their objectives. For instance, thebreeders might have the goal of altering a particular trait and endup creating an unwanted characteristic that will also harm theanimal’s health. In this case, they might decide to create largeudders that will hold the large quantities of milk. Instead, a cowwill find it difficult to walk with the heavy udders and it mightalso result in immense pain. Hence, the scientists are supposed tofocus on the measures that will ensure the animals are comfortable aswell. The selective breeding might also lead to the loss of varietythat will undermine the particular genetic variety (Dawkins &ampLayton, 149). In the process, the reduction of the genetic varietymight undermine their immunity to certain diseases in that region.Besides that, the animals will be vulnerable to specific pathogensthat might risk their chances of survival. Hence, the selectivepopulation might be exposed to more challenges and it shows the needfor the proper research to avoid any major mistakes. The recessivegenes can also cause some diseases to be more dangerous and they canaffect the humans in a worse way (Dawkins &amp Layton, 147). Thevarious examples addressed to show that selective breeding is aproblem and it illustrates that the breeders need to consider therights of the animals. On the other hand, the animals deserve theright to live independently without being manipulated to benefit thehuman beings. Often, they are just being misused so that they cangenerate more yields that will be used for economic purposes.

Should animals beplaced in zoos?

Zoos often house animals where they are protected from danger and theplace also plays an educative role since students and grown-ups oftenvisit the site. More important, some of the wild animals might beendangered based on a dangerous disease of the human encroachmentactivities. Hence, the most effective way of saving these animals isthrough the zoos that have professionals that take care of theendangered ones. Besides that, some animals might be harmed orinjured while they are in the parks, but, the lack of propertreatment might lead to their death (Derocher et al., 369). As aresult, the zoos have the medical officers that deal with theirhealth issues and focus on making them feel better. The same zooshave various wild animals that can be used for educative andentertainment purposes. The students and adults are fond of visitingthe zoos and understanding how the animals behave. They might get afew tips that describe how the animals eat, play, and move or eveninteract with human beings. The zoos will even create circuses wherethe baboons can jump from one tree to another while swinging on thebranches. The scenario can be a form of entertainment to thevisitors, and the management of the zoos can get massive amounts offunds in terms of the tickets that the students pay. Clearly, thezoos play an important role in the society and that ensures everyonegets a chance to understand the animals. It also assists thecommunity in appreciating the animals and how they interact with theecosystem that houses them. In the process, it will be quite usefulto acknowledge the essence of the environment in the society since itprotects the animals from any danger instead.

On the other hand, the same zoos are associated with variousconsequences that undermine the image of the institution. In thiscase, the zoos often prevent the animals from moving freely sincethey are enclosed. Most of these animals are not used to living incaptivity, and the circumstances might undermine their mental and thephysical well-being. For instance, the animals can suffer from stressand boredom since they are placed in places where they are used to.The absence of the physical exercises and the mental stimulationmight also undermine their overall health. At times, the zoos alsocreate an artificial ecosystem that will interfere with the breedingas well as the grazing patterns. The restriction and the lack of thenatural habitat might be a problem with the animals since they willrequire the freedom to move and that is a problem (Derocher et al.,372). The fact that the scenario undermines the breeding groundreduces the chance of the animals surviving since they will notreproduce quite frequently. The way that it disrupts the grazingpatterns might also prevent them from getting the required nutrientsthat are supposed to support their wellbeing. All in all, theartificial setting provides multiple consequences that will restrainthe animals from maintaining the freedom as well. In the process, theanimals are even exposed to various challenges and that is a clearproblem instead. The zoo management needs to consider the efficientway in which they are supposed to protect the animals and ensure thatthey are not exposed to challenges. If the zoos cannot manage theproblems, they will be expected to be closed and the governmentshould focus on the parks that offer the animals the requiredfreedom. In summary, some of the zoos have the artificial ecosystemsthat undermine the rights of the animals and their chances ofsurvival as well.

Should thegovernment allow trophy hunting?

Trophy hunting refers to the way that people will hunt the animalsfor fun and they will display the horns or skins as decoration or aform of achievement. More important, the scenario goes against theanimal rights since they should be protected from harm. On the otherhand, such people believe that they will achieve the entertainmentgoals by killing more animals. Most of these people will head toAfrica and kill the animals that are huge and the rare in the park.In this case, the scenario shows how inhumane some people might be,and they will risk the lives of the innocent animals (Packer et al.,144). Apart from that, the same tourists will kill the rare animalsand that increase the number of the endangered animals in thesociety. The common species that are gunned down include thegiraffes, impala, baboons, or even elephants. Trophy hunting is asport activity that lacks any logic since most of these people willkill the animals for fun. The scenario undermines the progress madein improving the conservation in the society. In fact, the sport is athreat to the survival of the endangered species that should beprotected from the danger (Packer et al., 147). At the same time, thehunting should be undertaken in a controlled manner. However, thereckless practices are a risk to the animals, and the governmentshould undertake appropriate measures to prevent any consequencesthat will undermine the likelihood of the animals surviving. Hence,the sport should be ended since it does not benefit most of thesenations that are struggling to support the animals’ population thatis deteriorating at a very high rate instead. In summary, it is amatter of considering the rights of the animals and focus on therespect that exists between them.

Some of these hunters will claim that they pay huge amounts of fundsthat help them enhance the conversation measures. In reality, theirmoney will not play a huge role that improves the situation in theparks. They are simply achieving their selfish goals rather thaninitiating ways to support the environment that will support theanimals. Most of the time the management in these conservation sitesare associated with corrupt dealings and the money will be squanderedby the senior individuals that are in charge. Hence, the viablesolution is illegalizing trophy hunting and making sure that theanimals are well-protected from the selfish people. Other animalsthat are at risk of extinction and are the victims of the killinginclude the lions, leopards as well as rhinoceroses. A common exampleincludes the death of a lion in Zimbabwe that was killed by anAmerican hunter. In fact, the lion that is known as Cecil generateddebate and backlash since people were disgusted by the act (Nelson etal., 506). The international community was shocked at the behavior ofsome of these people that are blinded by the selfish gains and theyend up killing animals for the sake of sporting activities. Thescenario even led to the American government pushing for theimplementation of the Endangered Species Act that prohibits trophyhunting and other inhumane activities. In the process, it has alsobanned the sport that aims at getting the lion trophies that were aproblem at that time. All in all, the event proves that theoperations are a huge problem in the society since it violates theanimal rights. Prohibiting the act will be an important part thatwill help the community in fighting against the hunting activitiesinstead.

Conclusion

In conclusion, thesociety has seen enough cases where the animals are being mistreatedand that shows that the government, as well as the activists, need toimplement measures that will protect them from more harm. Inparticular, the society needs to reconsider the way they look at theanimals and believe that they also deserve their rights that arebeing violated currently. In this case, it is clear that most ofthese activities provide harsh conditions that the animals do notdeserve. In fact, the scenarios are a risk to the health and thewell-being of the animals. Hence, any decision that will save themfrom the torture will be well-deserved. For instance, the animalexperiments have led to the death of some animals while others areexposed to torture, involuntary feeding and the lack of freedom. Inthe process, the researchers have the option of using the In vitro(in glass) testing might reduce certain consequences that areassociated with animal cruelty. On the other hand, the process ofanimals being used for hard labor is so outdated and it shows thereasons for immediate change that will consider their wellbeing andhealth too. The huge loads and the long hours spent working revealshow the animals are suffering. As a result, relying on the machineryand technological advancement will be a proper alternative. Selectivebreeding also has its consequences despite its benefits and shows whythe scientists need to ensure that they are protected from any harm.The zoos have also shown some sense of unprofessionalism and the needto change the artificial ecosystem and ensure that it looks more likea natural habitat in order to maintain the proper breeding andgrazing patterns. Lastly, trophy hunting is evil and the governmentshould illegalize the practice and make sure that the perpetratorsare jailed. In summary, the animal rights are crucial and they shouldbe protected as well.

Works Cited

Dawkins, M. S., and R. Layton. &quotBreeding for better welfare:genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents.&quot AnimalWelfare-The UFAW Journal 21.2 (2012): 147.

Derocher, Andrew E., et al. &quotRapid ecosystem change and polarbear conservation.&quot Conservation Letters 6.5 (2013):368-375.

Favre, David. &quotAn International Treaty for Animal Welfare.&quotAnimal Law and Welfare-International Perspectives. SpringerInternational Publishing, 2016. 87-106.

Nelson, Fred, Peter Lindsey, and Guy Balme. &quotTrophy hunting andlion conservation: a question of governance?.&quot Oryx 47.04(2013): 501-509.

Packer, C., et al. &quotEffects of trophy hunting on lion andleopard populations in Tanzania.&quot Conservation Biology25.1 (2011): 142-153.

Pound, Pandora, and Michael B. Bracken. &quotIs animal researchsufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedicalresearch.&quot BMJ 348.3387 (2014): g3387.